When including but not limited to?Asked by: Lolita Ullrich
Score: 4.6/5 (52 votes)
Therefore "including but not limited to" is redundant (unless you are a lawyer writing a contract). Just use "including." Comma use is subjective and in most, but not all cases is a style choice. The only place in that sentence where commas are required is in the list at the end (running, jumping, and swimming).View full answer
One may also ask, How do you use including but not limited to?
Therefore, the better way to write a sentence using the phrase “including but not limited to” would be to place commas after the “including” and after the “to,” as in this example: The camp activities include, but are not limited to, team building, archery, and fishing.
In this manner, What is including but not limited to redundant?. “Include but not limited to” is one of many redundancies commonly found in legal language. “Include” means to make a part of something — it doesn't mean all-encompassing. So to add “but not limited to” is redundant.
Similarly one may ask, Is there a comma before the word including?
Use a comma before “including” and “such as” when followed by a nonrestrictive, nonessential phrase or clause. The new policy applies to everyone, including faculty. Some students make silly excuses, such as “My dog ate my homework.”
What does without limitation mean?
: without being controlled or stopped : without being limited allowing costs to increase without limit.
The words “includes”, “including” and “inclusive” and the phrases “in particular,” “such as,” “i.e.” and “for example” shall be interpreted and construed so as not to limit the generality of the words of general application or nature which precede those words. Without Limitation.
The term “including” shall mean including without limitation. Including Without Limitation. The words "includes", "including" and similar terms used in any Loan Document shall be construed as if followed by the words "without limitation".
In a defining clause, use that. In non-defining clauses, use which. Remember, which is as disposable as a sandwich bag. If you can remove the clause without destroying the meaning of the sentence, the clause is nonessential and you can use which.
Whether “including” requires a comma will depend on what the word is doing in your sentence. If it is part of a non-restrictive or unessential clause or phrase, you need a comma. On the other hand, if “including” is the start of a phrase that is essential to your sentence's meaning, you should not add a comma.
A few other points about 'such as' and 'including': Do not use a colon (:) after one of these terms; they are meant to directly introduce the relevant examples. It is acceptable to use a colon following a phrase such as "including the following:" at the end of a complete statement (independent clause).
What punctuation is required for “including but not limited to”? ... No punctuation is required, but commas after including and to would work just fine; they may be helpful if the phrase introduces a long or complex list. Dashes would work as well.
In general, a “non-exhaustive list” of something is a list that doesn't show every single thing that would otherwise belong on that list.
From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary Englishbe limited to somethingbe limited to somethingto exist or happen only in a particular place, group, or area of activity The damage was limited to the roof. The damage was limited to the roof. ...
include means to contain as a part or member of a larger whole; it may indicate one, several, or all parts: This anthology includes works by Sartre and Camus. The price includes appetizer, main course, and dessert.
The usual phrase is 'included but not limited to' and occurs in contract language where someone wants the broadest possible coverage. It means that although you have certain items mentioned, others can be covered as well.
Answer: So to make choice a correct, the semicolon should be a comma. That should help with choices B and C also. Answer C is correct, because there are only 2 ways you can use 'however': at the beginning of a sentence followed by a comma or.
Do not use a colon in a complete sentence after phrases such as "such as," "including," and "for example." Because phrases like these already indicate to the reader that a list of examples will follow, there is no need to introduce them with a colon, which would merely be redundant.
You use including to introduce examples of people or things that are part of the group of people or things that you are talking about. Stars including Joan Collins are expected to attend.
Who is always used to refer to people. That is always used when you are talking about an object. That can also be used when you are talking about a class or type of person, such as a team.
We use which in questions as a determiner and interrogative pronoun to ask for specific information: 'Which car are we going in? ' he asked Alexander.
Online Editor – Grammar Checker. Enter the text that you want to check for grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes; then click the gray button below. Click on underlined words to get a list of proper wording alternatives, suggestions, and explanations.
It means that the things named are part of something larger, and the larger thing may also have other parts.
Drafters use the phrase without limiting the generality of the foregoing to introduce one or more examples of a concept described in the immediately preceding language. ... A simple alternative is the phrase including without limitation, which serves the same function.
The phrase “but not limited to” is usually used to refer to different things or elements as part of a group of things or elements. The author's objective is to ensure that the reader understands that the list or items referred to are some examples of items within a group but there may be more.
Here's how Black's Law Dictionary defines include: “To contain as a part of something. The participle including typically indicates a partial list (the plaintiff asserted five tort claims, including slander and libel).”